Contextual inference underlies the training of sensorimotor repertoires
Smith, M. A., Ghazizadeh, A. & Shadmehr, R. Interacting adaptive processes with other timescales underlie momentary motor studying. PLoS Biol. 4, e179 (2006).
Kitago, T., Ryan, S., Mazzoni, P., Krakauer, J. W. & Haith, A. M. Unlearning as opposed to financial savings in visuomotor adaptation: evaluating results of washout, passage of time, and removing of mistakes on motor reminiscence. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 307 (2013).
Sing, G. C. & Smith, M. A. Relief in studying charges related to anterograde interference effects from interactions between other timescales in motor adaptation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000893 (2010).
Herzfeld, D. J., Vaswani, P. A., Marko, M. Okay. & Shadmehr, R. A reminiscence of mistakes in sensorimotor studying. Science 345, 1349–1353 (2014).
Gonzalez Castro, L. N., Hadjiosif, A. M., Hemphill, M. A. & Smith, M. A. Environmental consistency determines the velocity of motor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 24, 1050–1061 (2014).
McDougle, S. D. et al. Credit score project in movement-dependent reinforcement studying. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6797–6802 (2016).
Donchin, O., Francis, J. T. & Shadmehr, R. Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial habits of adaptive programs that be told with foundation purposes: idea and experiments in human motor keep an eye on. J. Neurosci. 23, 9032–9045 (2003).
Thoroughman, Okay. A. & Shadmehr, R. Finding out of motion via adaptive aggregate of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747 (2000).
Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A. & Krakauer, J. W. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor keep an eye on. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 89–108 (2010).
Wolpert, D. M. & Kawato, M. A couple of paired ahead and inverse fashions for motor keep an eye on. Neural Netw. 11, 1317–1329 (1998).
Oh, Y. & Schweighofer, N. Minimizing precision-weighted sensory prediction mistakes by the use of reminiscence formation and switching in motor adaptation. J. Neurosci. 39, 9237–9250 (2019).
Gershman, S. J., Radulescu, A., Norman, Okay. A. & Niv, Y. Statistical computations underlying the dynamics of reminiscence updating. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003939 (2014).
Hulst, T. et al. Cerebellar degeneration reduces reminiscence resilience after prolonged coaching. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.03.185959 (2021).
Pekny, S. E., Criscimagna-Hemminger, S. E. & Shadmehr, R. Coverage and expression of human motor recollections. J. Neurosci. 31, 13829–13839 (2011).
Rescorla, R. A. & Heth, C. D. Reinstatement of worry to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Procedure. 1, 88–96 (1975).
Berniker, M. & Kording, Okay. Estimating the assets of motor mistakes for adaptation and generalization. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1454–1461 (2008).
Taylor, J. A., Wojaczynski, G. J. & Ivry, R. B. Trial-by-trial evaluation of intermanual switch all the way through visuomotor adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 3157–3172 (2011).
Kording, Okay. P., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Shadmehr, R. The dynamics of reminiscence on account of optimum adaptation to a converting frame. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 779–786 (2007).
Heald, J. B., Ingram, J. N., Flanagan, J. R. & Wolpert, D. M. A couple of motor recollections are discovered to keep an eye on other issues on a device. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 300–311 (2018).
Coltman, S. Okay., Cashaback, J. G. A. & Gribble, P. L. Each rapid and gradual studying processes give a contribution to financial savings following sensorimotor adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 121, 1575–1583 (2019).
Huang, V. S., Haith, A., Mazzoni, P. & Krakauer, J. W. Rethinking motor studying and financial savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free reminiscence for a hit movements combines with inside fashions. Neuron 70, 787–801 (2011).
Keisler, A. & Shadmehr, R. A shared useful resource between declarative reminiscence and motor reminiscence. J. Neurosci. 30, 14817–14823 (2010).
McDougle, S. D., Ivry, R. B. & Taylor, J. A. Taking purpose on the cognitive aspect of studying in sensorimotor adaptation duties. Developments Cogn. Sci. 20, 535–544 (2016).
McDougle, S. D., Bond, Okay. M. & Taylor, J. A. Specific and implicit processes represent the quick and gradual processes of sensorimotor studying. J. Neurosci. 35, 9568–9579 (2015).
Miyamoto, Y. R., Wang, S. & Smith, M. A. Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic specific technique in human motor studying. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 443–455 (2020).
Haruno, M., Wolpert, D. M. & Kawato, M. MOSAIC mannequin for sensorimotor studying and keep an eye on. Neural Comput. 13, 2201–2220 (2001).
Gershman, S. J., Blei, D. M. & Niv, Y. Context, studying, and extinction. Psychol. Rev. 117, 197–209 (2010).
Sanders, H., Wilson, M. A. & Gershman, S. J. Hippocampal remapping as hidden state inference. eLife 9, e51140 (2020).
Collins, A. & Koechlin, E. Reasoning, studying, and creativity: frontal lobe serve as and human decision-making. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001293 (2012).
Collins, A. G. E. & Frank, M. J. Cognitive keep an eye on over studying: growing, clustering, and generalizing task-set construction. Psychol. Rev. 120, 190–229 (2013).
Howard, I. S., Ingram, J. N. & Wolpert, D. M. A modular planar robot manipulandum with end-point torque keep an eye on. J. Neurosci. Strategies 181, 199–211 (2009).
Milner, T. E. & Franklin, D. W. Impedance keep an eye on and inside mannequin use all the way through the preliminary level of adaptation to novel dynamics in people. J. Physiol. 567, 651–664 (2005).
Scheidt, R. A., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Conditt, M. A., Rymer, W. Z. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Endurance of motor adaptation all the way through constrained, multi-joint, arm actions. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 853–862 (2000).
Teh, Y. W., Jordan, M. I., Beal, M. J. & Blei, D. M. Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101, 1566–1581 (2006).
Fox, E. B., Sudderth, E. B., Jordan, M. I. & Willsky, A. S. An HDP-HMM for programs with state patience. In Proc. twenty fifth Global Convention on System Finding out (eds. McCallum, A. & Roweis, S.) 312–319 (Omnipress, 2008).
Teh, Y. W. in Encyclopedia of System Finding out (eds. Sammut, C. & Webb, G. I.) 280–287 (Springer, 2011).
Carvalho, C. M., Johannes, M. S., Lopes, H. F. & Polson, N. G. Particle studying and smoothing. Stat. Sci. 25, 88–106 (2010).
Lopes, H. F., Carvalho, C. M., Johannes, M. S., & Polson, N. G. in Bayesian Statistics 9 (eds. Bernardo, J. M. et al.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Houlsby, N. et al. Cognitive tomography unearths complicated, task-independent psychological representations. Curr. Biol. 23, 2169–2175 (2013).
Acerbi, L. & Ma, W. J. Sensible Bayesian optimization for mannequin becoming with Bayesian adaptive direct seek. In Proc. Advances in Neural Knowledge Processing Methods (eds. Guyon, I. et al.) 1836–1846 (Curran, 2017).
Jeffreys, H. The Principle of Likelihood (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).
Li, J., Wang, Z. J., Palmer, S. J. & McKeown, M. J. Dynamic Bayesian community modeling of fMRI: a comparability of group-analysis strategies. Neuroimage 41, 398–407 (2008).
#Contextual #inference #underlies #studying #sensorimotor #repertoires