Technology

Contextual inference underlies the training of sensorimotor repertoires


  • 1.

    Smith, M. A., Ghazizadeh, A. & Shadmehr, R. Interacting adaptive processes with other timescales underlie momentary motor studying. PLoS Biol. 4, e179 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Kitago, T., Ryan, S., Mazzoni, P., Krakauer, J. W. & Haith, A. M. Unlearning as opposed to financial savings in visuomotor adaptation: evaluating results of washout, passage of time, and removing of mistakes on motor reminiscence. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 307 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Sing, G. C. & Smith, M. A. Relief in studying charges related to anterograde interference effects from interactions between other timescales in motor adaptation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000893 (2010).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Herzfeld, D. J., Vaswani, P. A., Marko, M. Okay. & Shadmehr, R. A reminiscence of mistakes in sensorimotor studying. Science 345, 1349–1353 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Gonzalez Castro, L. N., Hadjiosif, A. M., Hemphill, M. A. & Smith, M. A. Environmental consistency determines the velocity of motor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 24, 1050–1061 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    McDougle, S. D. et al. Credit score project in movement-dependent reinforcement studying. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6797–6802 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Donchin, O., Francis, J. T. & Shadmehr, R. Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial habits of adaptive programs that be told with foundation purposes: idea and experiments in human motor keep an eye on. J. Neurosci. 23, 9032–9045 (2003).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Thoroughman, Okay. A. & Shadmehr, R. Finding out of motion via adaptive aggregate of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747 (2000).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A. & Krakauer, J. W. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor keep an eye on. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 89–108 (2010).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Wolpert, D. M. & Kawato, M. A couple of paired ahead and inverse fashions for motor keep an eye on. Neural Netw. 11, 1317–1329 (1998).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Oh, Y. & Schweighofer, N. Minimizing precision-weighted sensory prediction mistakes by the use of reminiscence formation and switching in motor adaptation. J. Neurosci. 39, 9237–9250 (2019).

  • 12.

    Gershman, S. J., Radulescu, A., Norman, Okay. A. & Niv, Y. Statistical computations underlying the dynamics of reminiscence updating. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003939 (2014).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Hulst, T. et al. Cerebellar degeneration reduces reminiscence resilience after prolonged coaching. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.03.185959 (2021).

  • 14.

    Pekny, S. E., Criscimagna-Hemminger, S. E. & Shadmehr, R. Coverage and expression of human motor recollections. J. Neurosci. 31, 13829–13839 (2011).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Rescorla, R. A. & Heth, C. D. Reinstatement of worry to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Procedure. 1, 88–96 (1975).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Berniker, M. & Kording, Okay. Estimating the assets of motor mistakes for adaptation and generalization. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1454–1461 (2008).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Taylor, J. A., Wojaczynski, G. J. & Ivry, R. B. Trial-by-trial evaluation of intermanual switch all the way through visuomotor adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 3157–3172 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Kording, Okay. P., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Shadmehr, R. The dynamics of reminiscence on account of optimum adaptation to a converting frame. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 779–786 (2007).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Heald, J. B., Ingram, J. N., Flanagan, J. R. & Wolpert, D. M. A couple of motor recollections are discovered to keep an eye on other issues on a device. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 300–311 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Coltman, S. Okay., Cashaback, J. G. A. & Gribble, P. L. Each rapid and gradual studying processes give a contribution to financial savings following sensorimotor adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 121, 1575–1583 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Huang, V. S., Haith, A., Mazzoni, P. & Krakauer, J. W. Rethinking motor studying and financial savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free reminiscence for a hit movements combines with inside fashions. Neuron 70, 787–801 (2011).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Keisler, A. & Shadmehr, R. A shared useful resource between declarative reminiscence and motor reminiscence. J. Neurosci. 30, 14817–14823 (2010).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    McDougle, S. D., Ivry, R. B. & Taylor, J. A. Taking purpose on the cognitive aspect of studying in sensorimotor adaptation duties. Developments Cogn. Sci. 20, 535–544 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    McDougle, S. D., Bond, Okay. M. & Taylor, J. A. Specific and implicit processes represent the quick and gradual processes of sensorimotor studying. J. Neurosci. 35, 9568–9579 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Miyamoto, Y. R., Wang, S. & Smith, M. A. Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic specific technique in human motor studying. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 443–455 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Haruno, M., Wolpert, D. M. & Kawato, M. MOSAIC mannequin for sensorimotor studying and keep an eye on. Neural Comput. 13, 2201–2220 (2001).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Gershman, S. J., Blei, D. M. & Niv, Y. Context, studying, and extinction. Psychol. Rev. 117, 197–209 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Sanders, H., Wilson, M. A. & Gershman, S. J. Hippocampal remapping as hidden state inference. eLife 9, e51140 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Collins, A. & Koechlin, E. Reasoning, studying, and creativity: frontal lobe serve as and human decision-making. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001293 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Collins, A. G. E. & Frank, M. J. Cognitive keep an eye on over studying: growing, clustering, and generalizing task-set construction. Psychol. Rev. 120, 190–229 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Howard, I. S., Ingram, J. N. & Wolpert, D. M. A modular planar robot manipulandum with end-point torque keep an eye on. J. Neurosci. Strategies 181, 199–211 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Milner, T. E. & Franklin, D. W. Impedance keep an eye on and inside mannequin use all the way through the preliminary level of adaptation to novel dynamics in people. J. Physiol. 567, 651–664 (2005).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Scheidt, R. A., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Conditt, M. A., Rymer, W. Z. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Endurance of motor adaptation all the way through constrained, multi-joint, arm actions. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 853–862 (2000).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Teh, Y. W., Jordan, M. I., Beal, M. J. & Blei, D. M. Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101, 1566–1581 (2006).

    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Fox, E. B., Sudderth, E. B., Jordan, M. I. & Willsky, A. S. An HDP-HMM for programs with state patience. In Proc. twenty fifth Global Convention on System Finding out (eds. McCallum, A. & Roweis, S.) 312–319 (Omnipress, 2008).

  • 36.

    Teh, Y. W. in Encyclopedia of System Finding out (eds. Sammut, C. & Webb, G. I.) 280–287 (Springer, 2011).

  • 37.

    Carvalho, C. M., Johannes, M. S., Lopes, H. F. & Polson, N. G. Particle studying and smoothing. Stat. Sci. 25, 88–106 (2010).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Lopes, H. F., Carvalho, C. M., Johannes, M. S., & Polson, N. G. in Bayesian Statistics 9 (eds. Bernardo, J. M. et al.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).

  • 39.

    Houlsby, N. et al. Cognitive tomography unearths complicated, task-independent psychological representations. Curr. Biol. 23, 2169–2175 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Acerbi, L. & Ma, W. J. Sensible Bayesian optimization for mannequin becoming with Bayesian adaptive direct seek. In Proc. Advances in Neural Knowledge Processing Methods (eds. Guyon, I. et al.) 1836–1846 (Curran, 2017).

  • 41.

    Jeffreys, H. The Principle of Likelihood (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).

  • 42.

    Li, J., Wang, Z. J., Palmer, S. J. & McKeown, M. J. Dynamic Bayesian community modeling of fMRI: a comparability of group-analysis strategies. Neuroimage 41, 398–407 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     


  • #Contextual #inference #underlies #studying #sensorimotor #repertoires

    Related Articles

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *